PCSVX vs. RYPNX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PCSVX (PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments) and RYPNX (Royce Opportunity Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCSVX returned 8.92%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for RYPNX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PCSVX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for RYPNX.

Performance

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSVX achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly lower than RYPNX's 23.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSVX has underperformed RYPNX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while RYPNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.

PCSVX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: 12.45%
• YTD: 19.06%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 11.12%
• 5Y*: 5.88%
• 10Y*: 8.92%
• ALL TIME*: 8.30%

RYPNX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -5.08%
• 6M: 13.16%
• YTD: 23.58%
• 1Y: 42.87%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 13.81%
• ALL TIME*: 12.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RYPNX Royce Opportunity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	19.06%	4.33%	6.24%	12.57%	-13.44%	25.68%	12.13%	25.80%	-16.67%	9.48%
RYPNX Royce Opportunity Fund	23.58%	11.95%	10.20%	19.72%	-17.19%	30.34%	26.52%	28.24%	-20.10%	21.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSVX and RYPNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997	0.91

The correlation between PCSVX and RYPNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCSVX vs. RYPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCSVX

PCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 74
PCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
PCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

RYPNX

RYPNX Risk / Return Rank: 77
RYPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RYPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RYPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RYPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RYPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCSVX	RYPNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.72	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.41	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	3.18	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	11.32	-2.62

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the RYPNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSVX and RYPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum RYPNX drawdown of -69.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSVX and RYPNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSVX	RYPNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.95%	-69.31%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-12.01%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.96%	-30.23%	-4.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	-30.77%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.65%	-50.61%	+3.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-7.72%	+6.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-10.63%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	3.37%	-0.27%

Volatility

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) is 3.56%, while Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that PCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCSVX	RYPNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	5.66%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	15.64%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.14%	22.22%	-6.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.26%	24.27%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	25.32%	-2.43%

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSVX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RYPNX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCSVX vs. RYPNX - Dividend Comparison

PCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than RYPNX's 7.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	2.98%	3.54%	18.45%	0.69%	22.49%	16.23%	0.61%	0.83%	7.14%	11.82%	2.62%	11.87%
RYPNX Royce Opportunity Fund	7.79%	9.63%	7.95%	4.52%	5.12%	22.51%	0.00%	1.57%	10.21%	14.91%	6.89%	10.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCSVX and RYPNX in my portfolio?

PCSVX and RYPNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCSVX or RYPNX?

RYPNX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to PCSVX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSVX dropped -62.95% vs RYPNX's -69.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.