PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCSVX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSVX achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than PCGTX's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSVX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.


PCSVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
YTD
12.49%
6M
14.06%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
8.43%

PCGTX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.02%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.40%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCSVX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments
12.49%4.33%6.24%12.57%-13.44%25.68%12.13%25.80%-16.67%9.48%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
3.02%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSVX and PCGTX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

-0.06

The correlation between PCSVX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCSVX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSVX
PCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCSVXPCGTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.77

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

3.09

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.03

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.64

10.27

-0.63

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSVX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCSVXPCGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.77

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.05

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.29

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.96

-0.59

Drawdowns

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than PCGTX's maximum drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSVX and PCGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCSVXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.95%

-19.34%

-43.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-3.09%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.96%

-7.94%

-27.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

-19.20%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.65%

-19.34%

-27.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-1.31%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-1.85%

-8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.91%

+2.29%

Volatility

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) at 1.86%. This indicates that PCSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCSVXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

1.86%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

4.40%

+7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

5.68%

+10.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.36%

7.16%

+15.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.98%

5.39%

+17.59%

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSVX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCSVX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

PCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than PCGTX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.48%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%
PCSVX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments
3.15%3.54%18.45%0.69%22.49%16.23%0.61%0.83%7.14%11.82%2.62%11.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCSVX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCSVX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to PCGTX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSVX dropped -62.95% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

PCSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCSVX and PCGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer