PCSIX vs. TGRNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCSIX (PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments) and TGRNX (TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PCSIX returned 1.09%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TGRNX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCSIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for TGRNX.

Performance

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PCSIX having a 0.65% return and TGRNX slightly higher at 0.68%.

PCSIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: 5.56%
• 5Y*: 1.09%
• 10Y*: 2.60%

TGRNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 5.40%
• 3Y*: 4.65%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments	0.65%	7.36%	3.62%	8.02%	-13.84%	-0.71%	9.38%	10.37%	0.70%
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund	0.68%	6.76%	3.08%	5.73%	-13.43%	-0.60%	8.57%	9.15%	1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSIX and TGRNX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018	0.90

The correlation between PCSIX and TGRNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCSIX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSIX

PCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

TGRNX

TGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 36
TGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
TGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCSIX	TGRNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.73	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.69	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.20	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	7.23	+0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the TGRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSIX and TGRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCSIX	TGRNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.73	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.09	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.54	+0.49

Drawdowns

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, roughly equal to the maximum TGRNX drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSIX and TGRNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSIX	TGRNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.54%	-17.85%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.57%	-2.47%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.39%	-3.99%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.54%	-17.85%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-0.78%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-5.23%	+2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	0.75%	+0.06%

Volatility

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) has a higher volatility of 1.29% compared to TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) at 1.06%. This indicates that PCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCSIX	TGRNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	1.06%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.61%	2.31%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	3.15%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.48%	4.84%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	4.82%	+0.03%

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRNX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCSIX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison

PCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than TGRNX's 4.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments	5.17%	4.76%	5.66%	5.03%	3.47%	3.71%	5.62%	3.50%	3.39%	2.66%	4.23%	3.55%
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund	4.29%	4.31%	4.48%	3.30%	2.69%	2.76%	4.20%	4.38%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCSIX and TGRNX in my portfolio?

PCSIX and TGRNX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCSIX or TGRNX?

PCSIX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to TGRNX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSIX dropped -18.54% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.