PCSIX vs. PCSGX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX).
PCSIX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. PCSGX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments | -0.19% | 7.36% | 3.62% | 8.02% | -13.84% | -0.71% | 9.38% | 10.37% | -1.17% | 5.46% |
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments | -6.14% | 2.00% | 12.20% | 15.89% | -26.58% | 14.91% | 38.85% | 24.05% | 0.33% | 23.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCSIX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly higher than PCSGX's -6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSIX has underperformed PCSGX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while PCSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.
PCSIX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
PCSGX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -6.14%
- 6M
- -5.46%
- 1Y
- 7.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCSIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PCSGX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCSIX vs. PCSGX — Risk / Return Rank
PCSIX
PCSGX
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCSIX | PCSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.36 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 0.71 | +1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 0.22 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 0.77 | +4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCSIX | PCSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.36 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | -0.05 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.42 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.35 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCSIX and PCSGX is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Dividend Comparison
PCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than PCSGX's 6.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSIX PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments | 5.28% | 4.76% | 5.66% | 5.03% | 3.47% | 3.71% | 5.62% | 3.50% | 3.39% | 2.66% | 4.23% | 3.55% |
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments | 6.82% | 6.40% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.92% | 6.50% | 15.70% | 20.15% | 5.56% | 0.00% | 25.13% |
Drawdowns
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum PCSGX drawdown of -74.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSIX and PCSGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCSIX | PCSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -74.84% | +56.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -13.48% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.54% | -37.48% | +18.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | -39.35% | +20.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -15.69% | +13.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -23.05% | +20.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 4.61% | -3.79% |
Volatility
PCSIX vs. PCSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) is 1.49%, while PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that PCSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCSIX | PCSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 7.73% | -6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 14.93% | -12.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 23.85% | -19.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 22.83% | -17.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 22.80% | -17.97% |