PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCSIX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSIX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSIX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 2.60%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.


PCSIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
2.60%

PCGTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.30%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCSIX
PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments
0.65%7.36%3.62%8.02%-13.84%-0.71%9.38%10.37%-1.17%5.46%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
3.02%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSIX and PCGTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.81

The correlation between PCSIX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCSIX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSIX
PCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCSIXPCGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.33

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

11.48

-3.66

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSIX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCSIXPCGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.81

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.05

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.29

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.96

+0.06

Drawdowns

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSIX and PCGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCSIXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-19.34%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-3.09%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.39%

-7.94%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-19.20%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

-19.34%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.31%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-1.85%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.92%

-0.11%

Volatility

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments (PCSIX) is 1.29%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that PCSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCSIXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.85%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

4.40%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

5.67%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.48%

7.16%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

5.39%

-0.54%

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCSIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCSIX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

PCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than PCGTX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.48%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%
PCSIX
PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments
5.17%4.76%5.66%5.03%3.47%3.71%5.62%3.50%3.39%2.66%4.23%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PCSIX and PCGTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to PCSIX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSIX dropped -18.54% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCSIX and PCGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer