PCRB vs. PULT
PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) and PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCRB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Putnam, while PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PCRB returned 4.09%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for PULT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCRB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PULT.
Performance
PCRB vs. PULT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRB achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than PULT's 1.23% return.
PCRB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCRB vs. PULT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | -0.32% | 7.21% | 1.91% | 2.41% |
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 1.23% | 5.08% | 5.93% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRB and PULT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.27 |
PCRB vs. PULT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PCRB
PULT
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
PCRB
PULT
Healthcare
PCRB
PULT
Financial Services
PCRB
PULT
Consumer Defensive
PCRB
PULT
-
Basic Materials
PCRB
-
PULT
Consumer Cyclical
PCRB
-
PULT
Energy
PCRB
-
PULT
Industrials
PCRB
-
PULT
Real Estate
PCRB
-
PULT
Technology
PCRB
-
PULT
Utilities
PCRB
-
PULT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRB vs. PULT — Risk / Return Rank
PCRB
PULT
PCRB vs. PULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCRB | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 3.12 | -1.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 14.92 | -13.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 102.05 | -97.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCRB | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 5.71 | -4.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 8.37 | -7.78 |
Drawdowns
PCRB vs. PULT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRB drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, which is greater than PULT's maximum drawdown of -0.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRB and PULT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRB | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -0.34% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -0.29% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.85% | -0.29% | -5.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.29% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -0.02% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.04% | +0.89% |
Volatility
PCRB vs. PULT - Volatility Comparison
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) at 0.52%. This indicates that PCRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRB | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 0.52% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 0.62% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 0.75% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 0.63% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 0.63% | +5.00% |
PCRB vs. PULT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PULT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRB vs. PULT - Dividend Comparison
PCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than PULT's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | 9.79% | 4.30% | 4.38% | 3.65% |
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 4.65% | 4.59% | 5.38% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCRB and PULT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCRB has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to PULT (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRB dropped -7.20% vs PULT's -0.34%.
On 3-year performance, PULT leads with 5.35% vs 4.09% for PCRB. On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PULT has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PULT has performed better with a 5.35% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PCRB.
PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 4.65% for PULT.
PCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while PULT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PCRB and 0.25% for PULT.
PULT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCRB and PULT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer