PCRB vs. HTAB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB).

PCRB and HTAB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PCRB is an actively managed fund by Putnam. It was launched on Jan 19, 2023. HTAB is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018.

Performance

PCRB vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCRB vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	0.24%	7.21%	1.91%	2.41%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	0.51%	2.86%	1.52%	3.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCRB achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 0.51% return.

PCRB

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HTAB

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 3.32%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCRB vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.

HTAB

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF

PCRB

Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -

Return for Risk

PCRB vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCRB

PCRB Risk / Return Rank: 52
PCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

HTAB

HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 28
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 29
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCRB vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCRB	HTAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.59	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	0.81	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.13	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	0.77	+1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	1.92	+3.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCRB vs. HTAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the HTAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCRB and HTAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCRB	HTAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.59	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.42	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between PCRB and HTAB is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PCRB vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison

PCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than HTAB's 3.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	9.90%	4.30%	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	3.92%	3.88%	3.57%	3.21%	2.26%	2.18%	1.64%	2.77%	1.61%

Drawdowns

PCRB vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCRB drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, smaller than the maximum HTAB drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRB and HTAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCRB	HTAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.20%	-14.76%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	-4.51%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.81%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-2.93%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.81%	-0.95%

Volatility

PCRB vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) is 1.53%, while Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that PCRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCRB	HTAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	1.69%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	2.57%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27%	5.66%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.70%	5.70%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.70%	5.19%	+0.51%