PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCRB vs. FCBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCRB vs. FCBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PCRB

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FCBD

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.07%
6M
0.25%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCRB vs. FCBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
-0.48%7.21%0.17%
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
0.37%6.29%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PCRB and FCBD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.87

The correlation between PCRB and FCBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCRB vs. FCBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FCBD
FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCRB vs. FCBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCRBFCBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

PCRB vs. FCBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCRB vs. FCBD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCRBFCBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

Volatility

PCRB vs. FCBD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCRBFCBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

PCRB vs. FCBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCRB vs. FCBD - Dividend Comparison

PCRB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
4.17%4.34%0.08%0.00%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
9.42%4.30%4.38%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCRB and FCBD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 4.17% for FCBD.

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PCRB and 0.90% for FCBD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCRB and FCBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer