PCRB vs. DMBS
PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) and DMBS (Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PCRB returned 4.11%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for DMBS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCRB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DMBS.
Performance
PCRB vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRB achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DMBS's 0.66% return.
PCRB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMBS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCRB vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | -0.48% | 7.21% | 1.91% | 2.22% |
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF | 0.66% | 8.54% | 2.09% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRB and DMBS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PCRB and DMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRB vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank
PCRB
DMBS
PCRB vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCRB | DMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.83 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 6.05 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCRB vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRB drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, smaller than the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRB and DMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRB | DMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -8.14% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -3.20% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.85% | -7.24% | +1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -1.44% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -1.70% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Volatility
PCRB vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRB | DMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.25% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 3.12% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 4.14% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 6.25% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 6.25% | -0.63% |
PCRB vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRB vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison
PCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than DMBS's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF | 5.11% | 4.96% | 4.97% | 2.82% |
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | 9.42% | 4.30% | 4.38% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PCRB and DMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DMBS has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to PCRB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRB dropped -7.20% vs DMBS's -8.14%.
On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.46% vs 4.11% for PCRB. On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.46% return vs 4.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.
PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 5.11% for DMBS.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PCRB and 0.49% for DMBS.
DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCRB and DMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer