PCR vs. CTA
PCR (Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCR is a Multistrategy fund tracking the VettaFi Private Credit Index, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. PCR is passively managed, while CTA is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PCR vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCR achieves a -10.18% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's -2.09% return.
PCR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -10.18%
- 6M
- -10.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCR vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCR Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF | -10.18% | -5.73% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -2.09% | -1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCR and CTA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCR vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
PCR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CTA
PCR vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF (PCR) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCR vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCR drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CTA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCR and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -19.73% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.33% | -19.66% | +4.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.82% | -5.84% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.81% | — |
Volatility
PCR vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCR | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 20.43% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 16.62% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 16.62% | +1.97% |
Dividends
PCR vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
PCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, more than CTA's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.13% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
PCR Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF | 8.86% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCR and CTA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCR has the higher dividend yield at 8.86%, compared with 5.13% for CTA.
PCR is categorized as Multistrategy, while CTA is Systematic Trend.
Find the right allocation for PCR and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer