PCN vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PCN vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCN vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -2.23% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than PFORX's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PCN has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCN vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCN vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
PCN
PFORX
PCN vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCN | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | 0.64 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 0.89 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.12 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.61 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 2.82 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCN | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 0.64 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.31 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.90 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.25 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCN and PFORX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCN vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than PFORX's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.88% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
PCN vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCN | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.12% | -13.87% | -47.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -3.99% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.39% | -13.71% | -19.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | -13.87% | -36.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -3.69% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -1.95% | -5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 0.87% | +3.45% |
Volatility
PCN vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.93%. This indicates that PCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCN | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 1.93% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 2.53% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 3.38% | +12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 3.46% | +13.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 3.08% | +18.89% |