PCMM vs. CLOC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PCMM (BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF) and CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCMM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CLOC.

Performance

PCMM vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCMM achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than CLOC's 2.65% return.

PCMM

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCMM vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	2.09%	1.44%
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF	2.65%	0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PCMM and CLOC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

PCMM vs. CLOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCMM

PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 54
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CLOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCMM vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCMM	CLOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.96	—	—

Drawdowns

PCMM vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCMM drawdown since its inception was -4.32%, which is greater than CLOC's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMM and CLOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCMM	CLOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-0.54%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	0.00%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-0.06%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCMM	CLOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49%	0.88%	+2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.90%	0.88%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.90%	0.88%	+4.02%

PCMM vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCMM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCMM vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison

PCMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than CLOC's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF	3.66%	1.15%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	6.56%	7.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCMM and CLOC in my portfolio?

PCMM and CLOC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCMM or CLOC?

On fees, CLOC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCMM or CLOC?

CLOC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for PCMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCMM or CLOC?

PCMM has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 3.66% for CLOC.

What is the main difference between PCMM and CLOC?

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and AAM. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for PCMM and 0.49% for CLOC.