PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLPX vs. PIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLPX achieves a 36.90% return, which is significantly higher than PIMIX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLPX has outperformed PIMIX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while PIMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.71% annualized return.


PCLPX

1D
0.66%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
36.90%
6M
35.89%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
11.69%

PIMIX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.91%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.41%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLPX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2
36.90%4.45%5.92%0.24%23.04%43.50%-9.12%19.39%-12.15%10.53%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
1.00%11.08%5.45%9.36%-9.07%2.62%5.84%8.10%0.63%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLPX and PIMIX is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.10

The correlation between PCLPX and PIMIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLPX vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLPX
PCLPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PCLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PIMIX
PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCLPXPIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.95

2.29

+4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.88

7.97

+9.91

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLPX and PIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLPXPIMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.04

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.73

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

1.11

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

1.57

-1.41

Drawdowns

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLPX drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than PIMIX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLPX and PIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLPXPIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.98%

-13.39%

-53.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-3.69%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-3.84%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-13.34%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.87%

-13.39%

-38.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

-0.93%

-3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-1.69%

-22.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.06%

+1.60%

Volatility

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) at 1.68%. This indicates that PCLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLPXPIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.97%

1.68%

+5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

3.29%

+13.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

4.15%

+15.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

4.84%

+14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.63%

4.25%

+36.38%

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PIMIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLPX vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison

PCLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than PIMIX's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLPX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2
1.35%1.31%5.22%4.65%43.16%74.10%0.71%2.39%18.62%12.52%0.15%1.92%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
5.83%6.01%6.27%6.21%4.98%4.02%4.88%5.83%5.66%5.37%5.52%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLPX and PIMIX have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLPX has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to PIMIX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLPX dropped -66.98% vs PIMIX's -13.39%.

PCLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLPX and PIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer