PCLO vs. PFFR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus, while PFFR is a REIT fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. PCLO is actively managed, while PFFR is passively managed. Over the past year, PCLO returned 5.10% vs 4.90% for PFFR. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.

Performance

PCLO vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PCLO having a 2.68% return and PFFR slightly higher at 2.79%.

PCLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 2.19%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.14%

PFFR

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.09%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.90%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: 1.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	$90.83K	$132.76K	$166.26K
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF	$838.38K	$729.26K	$621.04K

PCLO vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	2.68%	5.39%	0.46%
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF	2.79%	5.36%	-2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLO and PFFR is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

PCLO vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLO

PCLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
PCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PFFR

PFFR Risk / Return Rank: 25
PFFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PFFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PFFR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PFFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PFFR Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLO vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCLO	PFFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.11	0.61	+5.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.23	0.91	+10.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.70	1.11	+1.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	19.50	0.75	+18.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	120.92	1.68	+119.24

PCLO vs. PFFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLO Sharpe Ratio is 6.11, which is higher than the PFFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLO and PFFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCLO vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum PFFR drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and PFFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLO	PFFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-53.02%	+52.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.26%	-6.57%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.14%	+1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-6.91%	+6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	2.91%	-2.87%

Volatility

PCLO vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) is 0.22%, while InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that PCLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCLO	PFFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.22%	2.10%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.68%	6.25%	-5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84%	8.10%	-7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.12%	10.54%	-9.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.12%	20.38%	-19.26%

PCLO vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLO vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison

PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, less than PFFR's 8.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	5.19%	5.53%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF	8.28%	7.99%	7.78%	7.72%	8.60%	6.08%	6.11%	5.77%	6.48%	6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLO and PFFR in my portfolio?

PCLO and PFFR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCLO or PFFR?

PFFR has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to PCLO (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLO dropped -0.76% vs PFFR's -53.02%.

Which ETF is better, PCLO or PFFR?

On 1-year performance, PCLO leads with 5.10% vs 4.90% for PFFR. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PCLO or PFFR?

Over the 1-year period, PCLO has performed better with a 5.10% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLO or PFFR?

PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLO or PFFR?

PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.28%, compared with 5.19% for PCLO.

What is the main difference between PCLO and PFFR?

PCLO is categorized as CLO, while PFFR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 0.45% for PFFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.11 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.