PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLO vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLO vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLO achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's 0.85% return.


PCLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.19%
YTD
2.68%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.14%

BKLN

1D
0.20%
1M
0.93%
6M
1.44%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
4.21%
ALL TIME*
3.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$124.78M$121.39M$171.07M
$90.83K$132.76K$166.26K

PCLO vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PCLO
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF
2.68%5.39%0.46%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.85%6.88%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLO and BKLN is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.05

The correlation between PCLO and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLO vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLO
PCLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLO vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCLOBKLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.70

1.36

+1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.50

1.40

+18.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

120.92

5.42

+115.50

PCLO vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLO Sharpe Ratio is 6.11, which is higher than the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLO and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLO vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLOBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-24.17%

+23.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.26%

-3.07%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-1.08%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.79%

-0.75%

Volatility

PCLO vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) is 0.22%, while Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that PCLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLOBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.37%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

2.53%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84%

2.78%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.12%

4.47%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.12%

6.42%

-5.30%

PCLO vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLO vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, less than BKLN's 6.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.51%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
PCLO
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF
5.19%5.53%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLO and BKLN have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKLN has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to PCLO (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLO dropped -0.76% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

On 1-year performance, PCLO leads with 5.10% vs 4.29% for BKLN. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PCLO has performed better with a 5.10% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 5.19% for PCLO.

PCLO is categorized as CLO, while BKLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 0.65% for BKLN.

PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.11 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLO and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer