PCLO vs. BKLN
PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) and BKLN (Invesco Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus, while BKLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. PCLO is actively managed, while BKLN is passively managed. Over the past year, PCLO returned 5.10% vs 4.29% for BKLN. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKLN.
Performance
PCLO vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLO achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's 0.85% return.
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.14%
BKLN
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $124.78M | $121.39M | $171.07M | |
| $90.83K | $132.76K | $166.26K |
PCLO vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 2.68% | 5.39% | 0.46% |
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF | 0.85% | 6.88% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLO and BKLN is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024 | 0.05 |
The correlation between PCLO and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLO vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank
PCLO
BKLN
PCLO vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCLO | BKLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.70 | 1.36 | +1.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.50 | 1.40 | +18.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 120.92 | 5.42 | +115.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCLO vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and BKLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLO | BKLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -24.17% | +23.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.26% | -3.07% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -1.08% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.79% | -0.75% |
Volatility
PCLO vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) is 0.22%, while Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that PCLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLO | BKLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 0.37% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | 2.53% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 2.78% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.12% | 4.47% | -3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.12% | 6.42% | -5.30% |
PCLO vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLO vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison
PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, less than BKLN's 6.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.41% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 3.11% | 3.56% | 4.86% | 4.52% | 3.50% | 4.54% | 4.12% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.19% | 5.53% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLO and BKLN have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKLN has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to PCLO (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLO dropped -0.76% vs BKLN's -24.17%.
On 1-year performance, PCLO leads with 5.10% vs 4.29% for BKLN. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PCLO has performed better with a 5.10% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.
BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 5.19% for PCLO.
PCLO is categorized as CLO, while BKLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 0.65% for BKLN.
PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.11 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCLO and BKLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer