PCLO vs. AAUS
PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) and AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus, while AAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PCLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AAUS.
Performance
PCLO vs. AAUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLO achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than AAUS's 9.48% return.
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLO vs. AAUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 1.97% | 2.52% |
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 9.48% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLO and AAUS is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLO vs. AAUS — Risk / Return Rank
PCLO
AAUS
PCLO vs. AAUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) and Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCLO | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.94 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 10.34 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.76 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.27 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 123.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLO | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.62 | 1.90 | +2.72 |
Drawdowns
PCLO vs. AAUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum AAUS drawdown of -9.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLO and AAUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLO | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -9.13% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.74% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -1.31% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | — | — |
Volatility
PCLO vs. AAUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLO | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 12.45% | -11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 12.45% | -11.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 12.45% | -11.30% |
PCLO vs. AAUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AAUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLO vs. AAUS - Dividend Comparison
PCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than AAUS's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.27% | 5.53% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLO and AAUS have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PCLO.
PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.34% for AAUS.
PCLO is categorized as CLO, while AAUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PCLO and 0.15% for AAUS.
Find the right allocation for PCLO and AAUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer