PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLIX vs. PCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLIX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLIX achieves a 36.81% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLIX has outperformed PCN with an annualized return of 12.24%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.14% annualized return.


PCLIX

1D
0.54%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
36.81%
6M
35.82%
1Y
46.35%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
12.24%

PCN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
1.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLIX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
36.81%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%19.37%-12.02%10.86%
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
-4.37%5.55%19.52%16.22%-22.88%6.93%-2.19%39.10%-5.94%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLIX and PCN is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.14

The correlation between PCLIX and PCN shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLIX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PCN
PCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLIX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCLIXPCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.04

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.01

0.13

+6.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.91

0.39

+17.53

PCLIX vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLIX and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLIXPCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

0.14

+2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.04

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.39

-0.21

Drawdowns

PCLIX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLIX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than PCN's maximum drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLIX and PCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLIXPCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-61.12%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-10.40%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-22.53%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

-33.39%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

-50.27%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-6.87%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-7.20%

-16.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.56%

-0.89%

Volatility

PCLIX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 2.35%. This indicates that PCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLIXPCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.97%

2.35%

+4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

6.97%

+9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

9.61%

+9.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

16.18%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.55%

21.94%

+18.61%

PCLIX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLIX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than PCN's 11.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
1.37%2.45%7.50%5.06%42.60%73.41%0.77%2.46%18.58%12.63%0.16%2.22%
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
11.58%10.58%10.06%10.88%12.66%7.89%7.83%7.37%9.60%7.85%11.98%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLIX and PCN have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLIX has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to PCN (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLIX dropped -66.60% vs PCN's -61.12%.

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLIX and PCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer