PCLIX vs. FFGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX).
PCLIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on May 27, 2010. FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Performance
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund | 30.80% | 5.76% | 8.53% | 0.69% | 23.32% | 43.83% | -9.18% | 19.37% | -12.02% | 10.86% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLIX achieves a 30.80% return, which is significantly higher than FFGCX's 22.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCLIX having a 13.29% annualized return and FFGCX not far ahead at 13.82%.
PCLIX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 19.14%
- YTD
- 30.80%
- 6M
- 31.76%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCLIX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank
PCLIX
FFGCX
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCLIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.57 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 3.09 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.46 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 17.89 | -9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.57 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.74 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.62 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.35 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLIX and FFGCX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison
PCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than FFGCX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund | 1.43% | 2.45% | 7.50% | 5.06% | 42.60% | 73.41% | 0.77% | 2.46% | 18.58% | 12.63% | 0.16% | 2.22% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
Drawdowns
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLIX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than FFGCX's maximum drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLIX and FFGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.60% | -57.23% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -14.64% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.59% | -27.22% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.78% | -48.43% | -3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.30% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -19.54% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.83% | +1.10% |
Volatility
PCLIX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a higher volatility of 10.48% compared to Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) at 6.10%. This indicates that PCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCLIX | FFGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.48% | 6.10% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 13.74% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 20.49% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 21.53% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.53% | 22.54% | +17.99% |