PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLAX vs. PTTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLAX achieves a 36.60% return, which is significantly higher than PTTRX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLAX has outperformed PTTRX with an annualized return of 11.33%, while PTTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.31% annualized return.


PCLAX

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
36.60%
6M
35.76%
1Y
45.73%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
11.33%

PTTRX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.88%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.81%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
36.60%4.13%5.76%-0.14%22.73%43.18%-9.67%19.19%-12.47%10.30%
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
0.64%9.35%2.62%6.33%-14.72%-0.59%8.88%8.36%-0.24%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLAX and PTTRX is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

-0.08

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PCLAX and PTTRX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLAX vs. PTTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLAX
PCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PTTRX
PTTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PTTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCLAXPTTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.83

2.00

+4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

6.20

+11.37

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the PTTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLAX and PTTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLAXPTTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.59

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.12

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.44

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.15

-0.99

Drawdowns

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLAX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, which is greater than PTTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLAX and PTTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLAXPTTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.19%

-19.28%

-48.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-3.69%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-6.18%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-19.28%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.00%

-19.28%

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-1.49%

-3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-2.19%

-23.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.19%

+1.50%

Volatility

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) at 1.81%. This indicates that PCLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLAXPTTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

1.81%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

3.54%

+13.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

4.66%

+14.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

6.27%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.66%

5.23%

+35.43%

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PTTRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLAX vs. PTTRX - Dividend Comparison

PCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than PTTRX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
1.24%1.20%5.20%4.58%44.24%75.67%0.45%2.07%18.31%12.18%0.09%1.77%
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
4.54%4.47%4.61%3.81%3.63%2.59%6.11%3.96%3.13%2.63%3.02%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLAX and PTTRX have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLAX has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to PTTRX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLAX dropped -68.19% vs PTTRX's -19.28%.

PCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLAX and PTTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer