PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLAX vs. PONAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLAX achieves a 34.18% return, which is significantly higher than PONAX's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLAX has outperformed PONAX with an annualized return of 11.94%, while PONAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.


PCLAX

1D
0.13%
1M
9.96%
6M
29.76%
YTD
34.18%
1Y
38.79%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
5.05%

PONAX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-0.72%
YTD
-0.25%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
4.02%
ALL TIME*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
34.18%4.13%5.76%-0.14%22.73%43.18%-9.67%19.19%-12.47%10.30%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
-0.25%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLAX and PONAX is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.09

The correlation between PCLAX and PONAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.42 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLAX vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLAX
PCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCLAXPONAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.25

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

3.87

+4.20

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLAX and PONAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLAX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, which is greater than PONAX's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLAX and PONAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLAXPONAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.19%

-13.64%

-54.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.53%

-3.69%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-3.69%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-13.64%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.00%

-13.64%

-38.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-2.09%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.49%

-1.79%

-23.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

1.19%

+3.45%

Volatility

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) at 1.17%. This indicates that PCLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLAXPONAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

1.17%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

3.53%

+14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.98%

4.11%

+15.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

4.86%

+14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.63%

4.22%

+36.41%

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PONAX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLAX vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

PCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than PONAX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
10.82%1.20%5.20%4.58%44.24%75.67%0.45%2.07%18.31%12.18%0.09%1.77%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
4.96%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLAX and PONAX have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLAX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to PONAX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLAX dropped -68.19% vs PONAX's -13.64%.

PCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLAX and PONAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer