PCLAX vs. CVISX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PCLAX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund) and CVISX (Causeway International Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - PCLAX is a Commodities fund managed by PIMCO, while CVISX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, PCLAX returned 10.34%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for CVISX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLAX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for CVISX.

Performance

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) and Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLAX achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly higher than CVISX's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLAX has underperformed CVISX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while CVISX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.

PCLAX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -10.66%
• YTD: 23.56%
• 6M: 21.13%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

CVISX

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCLAX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	23.56%	4.13%	5.76%	-0.14%	22.73%	43.18%	-9.67%	19.19%	-12.47%	10.30%
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund	10.68%	32.93%	9.71%	26.74%	-11.51%	21.30%	2.48%	18.55%	-21.34%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLAX and CVISX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.32

The correlation between PCLAX and CVISX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCLAX vs. CVISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLAX

PCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 31
PCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
PCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

CVISX

CVISX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CVISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CVISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CVISX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CVISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CVISX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) and Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCLAX	CVISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.74	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	2.40	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.39	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	8.21	+0.13

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the CVISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLAX and CVISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLAX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, which is greater than CVISX's maximum drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLAX and CVISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLAX	CVISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.19%	-48.50%	-19.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.86%	-10.77%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.86%	-15.17%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.75%	-25.20%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.00%	-48.50%	-3.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.86%	-5.13%	-8.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.59%	-8.86%	-16.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.12%	+0.40%

Volatility

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) is 4.59%, while Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCLAX	CVISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	5.82%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.21%	12.52%	+4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.52%	14.77%	+4.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.55%	16.22%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.65%	16.74%	+23.91%

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CVISX's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLAX vs. CVISX - Dividend Comparison

PCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, less than CVISX's 14.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund	14.96%	16.56%	10.60%	6.14%	2.75%	3.48%	3.42%	3.57%	2.91%	8.23%	2.78%	2.00%
PCLAX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	11.75%	1.20%	5.20%	4.58%	44.24%	75.67%	0.45%	2.07%	18.31%	12.18%	0.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLAX and CVISX in my portfolio?

PCLAX and CVISX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCLAX or CVISX?

CVISX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PCLAX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLAX dropped -68.19% vs CVISX's -48.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.