PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCKPX vs. PONAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCKPX achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly higher than PONAX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PCKPX has outperformed PONAX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while PONAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.


PCKPX

1D
0.94%
1M
5.34%
YTD
17.93%
6M
14.44%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
10.69%

PONAX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.88%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.21%
1Y
7.96%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCKPX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund
17.93%10.58%11.55%15.90%-23.99%14.03%19.39%26.69%-12.23%17.59%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.83%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PCKPX and PONAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2008

0.22

The correlation between PCKPX and PONAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCKPX vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCKPX
PCKPX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PCKPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCKPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCKPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PCKPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCKPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCKPXPONAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.96

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

2.92

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.17

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.67

7.45

+5.22

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCKPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCKPX and PONAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCKPXPONAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.96

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.66

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.03

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.48

-1.05

Drawdowns

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCKPX drawdown since its inception was -55.77%, which is greater than PONAX's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCKPX and PONAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCKPXPONAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.77%

-13.64%

-42.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-3.69%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.79%

-3.90%

-25.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.71%

-13.64%

-22.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.38%

-13.64%

-32.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-1.03%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-1.80%

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

1.07%

+2.31%

Volatility

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that PCKPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCKPXPONAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

1.67%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

3.25%

+11.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.23%

4.10%

+16.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.45%

4.81%

+18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.24%

4.21%

+20.03%

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCKPX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PONAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCKPX vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

PCKPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than PONAX's 5.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCKPX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund
3.59%4.23%3.52%1.45%26.78%19.38%5.69%5.92%12.87%5.82%3.37%8.93%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.43%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCKPX and PONAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCKPX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to PONAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCKPX dropped -55.77% vs PONAX's -13.64%.

PCKPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCKPX and PONAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer