PCKPX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
PCKPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCKPX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | -3.90% | 10.58% | 11.55% | 15.90% | -23.99% | 14.03% | 19.39% | 26.69% | -12.23% | 17.59% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -2.23% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCKPX achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than PFORX's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PCKPX has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.
PCKPX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCKPX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCKPX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
PCKPX
PFORX
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCKPX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.64 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 0.89 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.61 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 2.82 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCKPX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.64 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.31 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.90 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.25 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCKPX and PFORX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
PCKPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than PFORX's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCKPX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 4.40% | 4.23% | 3.52% | 1.45% | 26.78% | 19.38% | 5.69% | 5.92% | 12.87% | 5.82% | 3.37% | 8.93% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.88% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCKPX drawdown since its inception was -55.77%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCKPX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCKPX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.77% | -13.87% | -41.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -3.99% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.71% | -13.71% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.38% | -13.87% | -32.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.25% | -3.69% | -8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -1.95% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 0.87% | +3.32% |
Volatility
PCKPX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.93%. This indicates that PCKPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCKPX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 1.93% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 2.53% | +12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 3.38% | +20.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 3.46% | +19.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 3.08% | +21.07% |