PCKEX vs. FRQKX
PCKEX (Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund) and FRQKX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PCKEX returned 12.61%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for FRQKX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCKEX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FRQKX.
Performance
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCKEX achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than FRQKX's 3.92% return.
PCKEX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FRQKX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 10.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCKEX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund | 11.59% | 20.28% | 15.56% | 33.53% | -18.16% | 17.98% |
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K | 3.92% | 9.91% | 4.42% | 8.62% | -12.30% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCKEX and FRQKX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PCKEX and FRQKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCKEX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank
PCKEX
FRQKX
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund (PCKEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCKEX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.91 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.57 | 12.38 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCKEX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.40 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.51 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.77 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCKEX drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCKEX and FRQKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCKEX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.84% | -16.97% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -3.42% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.95% | -5.17% | -11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -16.97% | -7.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.17% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -3.86% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 0.80% | +1.10% |
Volatility
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund (PCKEX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 1.65%. This indicates that PCKEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCKEX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 1.65% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 3.42% | +5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 4.17% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 5.56% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 5.76% | +10.28% |
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCKEX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCKEX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison
PCKEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than FRQKX's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K | 3.23% | 3.09% | 2.91% | 2.86% | 5.12% | 6.11% | 3.61% | 2.57% |
PCKEX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2065 Fund | 6.59% | 7.36% | 5.95% | 5.37% | 5.36% | 6.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCKEX and FRQKX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCKEX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FRQKX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCKEX dropped -24.84% vs FRQKX's -16.97%.
FRQKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCKEX and FRQKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer