PCIMX vs. SCYB
PCIMX (PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both funds - PCIMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Over the past 3 years, PCIMX returned 3.83%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for SCYB. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCIMX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCIMX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.87% return.
PCIMX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.12%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $27.25M | $28.58M | $31.43M |
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCIMX PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | -0.10% | 5.70% | 2.58% | 3.90% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.87% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCIMX and SCYB is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCIMX vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
PCIMX
SCYB
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (PCIMX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCIMX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.28 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.21 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 9.67 | -4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCIMX drawdown since its inception was -12.96%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIMX and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCIMX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -4.92% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -2.44% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.85% | -4.92% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -0.46% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -0.50% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.56% | +0.37% |
Volatility
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (PCIMX) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 0.74%. This indicates that PCIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCIMX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.74% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.89% | 3.04% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41% | 3.75% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 5.04% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 5.04% | -1.76% |
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCIMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCIMX vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
PCIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than SCYB's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCIMX PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 3.09% | 4.51% | 3.95% | 2.65% | 1.67% | 1.66% | 2.10% | 2.53% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 2.51% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.31% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCIMX and SCYB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCIMX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to SCYB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCIMX dropped -12.96% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
PCIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCIMX and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer