PCIMX vs. DBLTX
PCIMX (PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) and DBLTX (DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - PCIMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while DBLTX is a Total Bond Market fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, PCIMX returned 1.85%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for DBLTX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCIMX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBLTX.
Performance
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCIMX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PCIMX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.62% annualized return.
PCIMX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.12%
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 2.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCIMX PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | -0.10% | 5.70% | 2.58% | 5.54% | -7.30% | 0.47% | 4.19% | 6.52% | 1.05% | 4.60% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.46% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCIMX and DBLTX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010 | 0.44 |
The correlation between PCIMX and DBLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCIMX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank
PCIMX
DBLTX
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (PCIMX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCIMX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.16 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.04 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 2.49 | +2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCIMX drawdown since its inception was -12.96%, smaller than the maximum DBLTX drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIMX and DBLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCIMX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -16.49% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -3.17% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.85% | -5.33% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.41% | -16.49% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.41% | -16.49% | +5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.46% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -2.37% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.32% | -0.39% |
Volatility
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (PCIMX) is 0.85%, while DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that PCIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCIMX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 1.05% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.89% | 3.01% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41% | 3.80% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 5.62% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 4.42% | -1.14% |
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCIMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCIMX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison
PCIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than DBLTX's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.52% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
PCIMX PIMCO California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 3.09% | 4.51% | 3.95% | 2.65% | 1.67% | 1.66% | 2.10% | 2.53% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCIMX and DBLTX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBLTX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to PCIMX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCIMX dropped -12.96% vs DBLTX's -16.49%.
PCIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCIMX and DBLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer