PCIEX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PCIEX (PACE International Equity Investments) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PCIEX returned 10.26%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCIEX charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE International Equity Investments (PCIEX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCIEX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 10.72% return.

PCIEX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 8.11%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

FHLFX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PCIEX PACE International Equity Investments	8.11%	35.07%	6.07%	20.38%	-14.16%	12.33%	11.17%	19.09%	-12.60%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	10.72%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	21.66%	-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PCIEX and FHLFX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.91

The correlation between PCIEX and FHLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCIEX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCIEX

PCIEX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PCIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PCIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PCIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PCIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PCIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE International Equity Investments (PCIEX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCIEX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.68	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.39	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.26	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	8.44	+0.84

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCIEX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCIEX drawdown since its inception was -61.66%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIEX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCIEX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.66%	-33.58%	-28.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.81%	-11.37%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.32%	-13.62%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.28%	-29.36%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-6.07%	-10.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.03%	-0.28%

Volatility

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE International Equity Investments (PCIEX) is 4.46%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that PCIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCIEX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	4.75%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.10%	12.71%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.70%	15.27%	-1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	16.06%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	17.65%	-1.10%

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCIEX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCIEX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

PCIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.13%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCIEX PACE International Equity Investments	11.89%	12.85%	13.58%	4.22%	3.30%	8.10%	1.35%	2.77%	8.79%	2.13%	2.34%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCIEX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

PCIEX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCIEX or FHLFX?

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to PCIEX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCIEX dropped -61.66% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.