PCI vs. SCHI
PCI (PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF) and SCHI (Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCI is actively managed, while SCHI is passively managed. Over the past year, PCI returned 2.75% vs 2.20% for SCHI. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. PCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHI.
Performance
PCI vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's -0.64% return.
PCI
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.00K | $18.29K | $194.16K | |
| $42.16M | $42.05M | $59.83M |
PCI vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | -0.20% | 2.96% |
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | -0.64% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCI and SCHI is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCI vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank
PCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHI
PCI vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCI | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCI vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum SCHI drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and SCHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCI | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -20.67% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -3.01% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.18% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -5.61% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility
PCI vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCI | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 4.13% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 6.67% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 7.34% | -3.20% |
PCI vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCI vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison
PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than SCHI's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 5.49% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.65% | 4.99% | 5.11% | 4.27% | 3.10% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PCI and SCHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On 1-year performance, PCI leads with 2.75% vs 2.20% for SCHI. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PCI has performed better with a 2.75% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCI.
PCI has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 4.65% for SCHI.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.03% for SCHI.
Find the right allocation for PCI and SCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer