PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCI vs. PSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCI vs. PSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than PSH's 2.49% return.


PCI

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.39%
6M
-0.44%
YTD
-0.20%
1Y
2.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PSH

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.06%
6M
2.09%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.00K$18.29K$194.16K
$1.58M$1.47M$1.29M

PCI vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PCI and PSH is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCI vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PSH
PSH Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCI vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCIPSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

PCI vs. PSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCI vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, roughly equal to the maximum PSH drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and PSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCIPSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-3.06%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-1.42%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.16%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-0.26%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

Volatility

PCI vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCIPSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

2.95%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

3.20%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

3.20%

+0.94%

PCI vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSH's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCI vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison

PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, less than PSH's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PCI
PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF
5.49%2.18%0.00%
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
6.47%6.62%8.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCI and PSH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, PSH leads with 5.16% vs 2.75% for PCI. On fees, PCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PSH has performed better with a 5.16% return vs 2.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PSH.

PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 5.49% for PCI.

PCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PSH is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.45% for PSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCI and PSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer