PCGTX vs. PASIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) and PASIX (PACE Alternative Strategies Investments) are both mutual funds - PCGTX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by UBS, while PASIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by UBS. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX returned 1.55%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for PASIX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. PCGTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for PASIX.

Performance

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGTX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than PASIX's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX has underperformed PASIX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while PASIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.95% annualized return.

PCGTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 1.55%

PASIX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 3.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	3.02%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	6.55%	0.17%	2.83%
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments	4.04%	7.47%	6.56%	4.97%	0.22%	2.60%	9.48%	6.08%	-5.41%	3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGTX and PASIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2006	-0.04

The correlation between PCGTX and PASIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCGTX vs. PASIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

PASIX

PASIX Risk / Return Rank: 53
PASIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PASIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PASIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PASIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PASIX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCGTX	PASIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.06	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.02	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.76	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.48	10.77	+0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the PASIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGTX and PASIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCGTX	PASIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.06	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.90	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.79	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.39	+0.58

Drawdowns

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGTX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum PASIX drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGTX and PASIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCGTX	PASIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.34%	-32.27%	+12.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-3.36%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.94%	-4.01%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.20%	-4.81%	-14.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.34%	-10.50%	-8.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	0.00%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-6.32%	+4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.85%	+0.07%

Volatility

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) at 1.53%. This indicates that PCGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PASIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCGTX	PASIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	1.53%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	3.84%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	4.50%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.16%	5.06%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.39%	5.04%	+0.35%

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than PASIX's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCGTX vs. PASIX - Dividend Comparison

PCGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than PASIX's 10.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments	10.51%	10.93%	7.96%	3.57%	2.42%	6.45%	4.82%	0.00%	2.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.14%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.48%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCGTX and PASIX in my portfolio?

PCGTX and PASIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCGTX or PASIX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to PASIX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGTX dropped -19.34% vs PASIX's -32.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PASIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.