PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCGTX vs. JIBEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGTX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than JIBEX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX has underperformed JIBEX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while JIBEX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.09% annualized return.


PCGTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.30%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.55%

JIBEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
3.02%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.05%7.39%2.58%5.46%-9.24%-1.72%7.20%7.54%0.41%2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGTX and JIBEX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2000

0.77

The correlation between PCGTX and JIBEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCGTX vs. JIBEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JIBEX
JIBEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JIBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCGTXJIBEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.84

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

5.62

+5.86

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the JIBEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGTX and JIBEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCGTXJIBEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.50

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.23

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.59

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.33

+0.64

Drawdowns

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGTX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than JIBEX's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGTX and JIBEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCGTXJIBEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-13.85%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-2.21%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.94%

-3.37%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-13.81%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

-13.85%

-5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.40%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-3.64%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.72%

+0.20%

Volatility

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) at 0.92%. This indicates that PCGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIBEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCGTXJIBEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

0.92%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.40%

1.93%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.67%

2.73%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.16%

4.39%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.39%

3.58%

+1.81%

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than JIBEX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCGTX vs. JIBEX - Dividend Comparison

PCGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than JIBEX's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
3.68%4.03%3.39%2.90%2.14%1.79%3.15%2.69%2.74%2.33%2.39%1.54%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.48%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCGTX and JIBEX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to JIBEX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGTX dropped -19.34% vs JIBEX's -13.85%.

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCGTX and JIBEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer