PCGTX vs. CLDAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) and CLDAX (Calvert Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX returned 1.53%/yr vs 3.04%/yr for CLDAX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCGTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CLDAX.

Performance

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGTX achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than CLDAX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PCGTX has underperformed CLDAX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while CLDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.04% annualized return.

PCGTX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 2.82%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

CLDAX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: 3.64%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	2.82%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	6.55%	0.17%	2.83%
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	-0.17%	7.27%	1.39%	5.04%	-13.48%	-2.30%	14.56%	20.77%	-5.73%	9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGTX and CLDAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2005	0.72

The correlation between PCGTX and CLDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCGTX vs. CLDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 56
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CLDAX

CLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
CLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCGTX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.24	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.84	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.22	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	1.51	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.29	4.70	+6.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the CLDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGTX and CLDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCGTX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.24	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	-0.04	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.45	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.82	+0.14

Drawdowns

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGTX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CLDAX drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGTX and CLDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCGTX	CLDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.34%	-18.88%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-3.24%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.94%	-6.09%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.20%	-18.21%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.34%	-18.88%	-0.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-3.59%	+2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-3.92%	+2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	1.04%	-0.15%

Volatility

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison

PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) at 1.46%. This indicates that PCGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCGTX	CLDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	1.46%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	2.92%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	3.95%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.16%	5.64%	+1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.39%	6.81%	-1.42%

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than CLDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCGTX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison

PCGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than CLDAX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	4.23%	4.24%	4.16%	3.17%	1.80%	6.08%	5.22%	3.04%	3.63%	3.02%	7.02%	2.85%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.49%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCGTX and CLDAX in my portfolio?

PCGTX and CLDAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCGTX or CLDAX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to CLDAX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGTX dropped -19.34% vs CLDAX's -18.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.