PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCG vs. AENA.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PG&E Corporation (PCG) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PCG is traded in USD, while AENA.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AENA.MC values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCG achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than AENA.MC's 14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PCG has underperformed AENA.MC with an annualized return of -11.79%, while AENA.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 44.12% annualized return.


PCG

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.56%
6M
8.95%
YTD
7.46%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
-0.40%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
-11.79%

AENA.MC

1D
0.31%
1M
5.47%
6M
9.13%
YTD
14.74%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
83.81%
5Y*
54.81%
10Y*
44.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCG
PG&E Corporation
7.46%-19.72%12.25%10.95%33.94%-2.57%14.63%-54.23%-47.02%-24.51%
AENA.MC
Aena SA
14.74%147.84%96.05%109.36%-20.14%-9.52%-9.22%113.20%22.33%94.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PCG and AENA.MC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2015

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCG vs. AENA.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCG
PCG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AENA.MC
AENA.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AENA.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PG&E Corporation (PCG) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCGAENA.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.93

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

1.89

+1.81

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the AENA.MC Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCG and AENA.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCG drawdown since its inception was -94.65%, which is greater than AENA.MC's maximum drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCG and AENA.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCGAENA.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.65%

-50.48%

-44.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.82%

-18.90%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.63%

-18.90%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.63%

-43.29%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.65%

-50.48%

-44.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.40%

-6.00%

-69.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.57%

-12.00%

-14.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

9.31%

-1.68%

Volatility

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Volatility Comparison

PG&E Corporation (PCG) and Aena SA (AENA.MC) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCGAENA.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

6.60%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

18.64%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.40%

23.88%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.05%

54.52%

-26.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.57%

52.53%

+7.04%

Dividends

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Dividend Comparison

PCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than AENA.MC's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AENA.MC
Aena SA
4.05%40.97%38.80%28.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%40.65%47.86%22.66%20.89%0.00%
PCG
PG&E Corporation
1.02%0.78%0.27%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.46%3.17%3.42%

Financials

PCG vs. AENA.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PG&E Corporation and Aena SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. PCG values in USD, AENA.MC values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


PCG and AENA.MC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCG and AENA.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer