PCFI vs. JHLN
PCFI (Polen Floating Rate Income ETF) and JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCFI charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JHLN.
Performance
PCFI vs. JHLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCFI achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than JHLN's 1.34% return.
PCFI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- -0.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHLN
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCFI vs. JHLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCFI Polen Floating Rate Income ETF | 1.10% | -1.32% |
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.34% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCFI and JHLN is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCFI vs. JHLN — Risk / Return Rank
PCFI
JHLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCFI vs. JHLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Floating Rate Income ETF (PCFI) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCFI | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCFI vs. JHLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCFI drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, which is greater than JHLN's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFI and JHLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCFI | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -1.46% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.00% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -0.29% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
PCFI vs. JHLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCFI | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 2.59% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 2.59% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 2.59% | +4.48% |
PCFI vs. JHLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCFI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than JHLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCFI vs. JHLN - Dividend Comparison
PCFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, more than JHLN's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 4.29% | 1.88% |
PCFI Polen Floating Rate Income ETF | 9.57% | 7.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCFI and JHLN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCFI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCFI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JHLN.
PCFI has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 4.29% for JHLN.
They also come from different issuers: Polen and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCFI and 0.59% for JHLN.
Find the right allocation for PCFI and JHLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer