PCFAX vs. PONPX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX).
PCFAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 30, 2011. PONPX is managed by PIMCO.
Performance
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund | -2.26% | 6.44% | 20.44% | 17.64% | -12.75% | -38.68% | 9.25% | 21.17% | -12.42% | 12.52% |
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | -1.37% | 10.96% | 5.33% | 9.24% | -9.14% | 2.51% | 5.73% | 7.99% | 0.53% | 8.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCFAX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than PONPX's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFAX has underperformed PONPX with an annualized return of 2.97%, while PONPX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.55% annualized return.
PCFAX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
PONPX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCFAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PONPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCFAX vs. PONPX — Risk / Return Rank
PCFAX
PONPX
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCFAX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 1.54 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 2.21 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.29 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 1.84 | -1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 7.43 | -4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCFAX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.54 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.70 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 1.09 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.82 | -1.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCFAX and PONPX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Dividend Comparison
PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than PONPX's 5.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund | 3.04% | 2.26% | 6.30% | 1.99% | 13.66% | 100.48% | 18.04% | 2.29% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 26.20% |
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 5.48% | 5.91% | 6.16% | 6.11% | 4.89% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 5.73% | 5.56% | 5.27% | 5.42% | 7.77% |
Drawdowns
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -68.63%, which is greater than PONPX's maximum drawdown of -13.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and PONPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCFAX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.63% | -13.41% | -55.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.66% | -3.69% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.63% | -13.41% | -55.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.63% | -13.41% | -55.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.97% | -3.24% | -44.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -1.44% | -24.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 0.92% | +3.00% |
Volatility
PCFAX vs. PONPX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) at 1.88%. This indicates that PCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PONPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCFAX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 1.88% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 2.64% | +9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.79% | 4.27% | +18.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 4.75% | +29.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.34% | 4.19% | +26.15% |