PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCFAX vs. AVUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (AVUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PCFAX having a 18.44% return and AVUVX slightly lower at 18.39%.


PCFAX

1D
-0.45%
1M
6.15%
YTD
18.44%
6M
17.06%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
13.53%

AVUVX

1D
-0.87%
1M
0.39%
YTD
18.39%
6M
17.78%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PCFAX
PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund
18.44%6.44%20.44%17.64%-12.75%38.96%9.25%3.95%
AVUVX
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value Fund
18.39%8.88%8.83%22.96%-4.74%40.31%10.64%4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFAX and AVUVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019

0.94

The correlation between PCFAX and AVUVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCFAX vs. AVUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCFAX
PCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUVX
AVUVX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AVUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (AVUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCFAXAVUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

4.66

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

14.23

-0.39

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the AVUVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFAX and AVUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCFAXAVUVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.19

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.49

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.57

-0.12

Drawdowns

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUVX drawdown of -50.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and AVUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCFAXAVUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.29%

-50.24%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.25%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-28.81%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

-28.81%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.87%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-7.74%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.70%

+0.06%

Volatility

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (AVUVX) at 4.19%. This indicates that PCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCFAXAVUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

4.19%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

11.53%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

17.63%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

22.74%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

28.80%

-3.93%

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCFAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUVX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCFAX vs. AVUVX - Dividend Comparison

PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than AVUVX's 5.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUVX
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value Fund
5.99%7.09%4.11%1.57%8.07%5.83%0.73%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCFAX
PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund
2.51%2.26%6.30%1.99%13.66%235.35%18.04%2.29%12.48%8.98%0.00%26.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PCFAX and AVUVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCFAX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to AVUVX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCFAX dropped -52.29% vs AVUVX's -50.24%.

AVUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCFAX and AVUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer