PCEMX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCEMX (PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, PCEMX returned 10.42%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCEMX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with PCEMX at 30.04% and FPADX at 30.04%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: PCEMX at 10.42% and FPADX at 10.42%.

PCEMX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 10.47%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 6M: 32.30%
• 1Y: 60.94%
• 3Y*: 24.68%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

FPADX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 6M: 32.95%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments	30.04%	36.75%	4.15%	10.33%	-18.97%	-1.79%	20.13%	19.01%	-16.42%	34.14%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	30.04%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEMX and FPADX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between PCEMX and FPADX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PCEMX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEMX

PCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 92
PCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCEMX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.75	3.34	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	4.23	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.62	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	4.48	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.06	17.77	+0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEMX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCEMX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75	3.34	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.47	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.59	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.37	-0.09

Drawdowns

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEMX drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEMX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEMX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.32%	-39.16%	-26.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.42%	-13.28%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.18%	-16.09%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.27%	-37.00%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.17%	-39.16%	-0.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.87%	-13.26%	-7.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	3.34%	+0.24%

Volatility

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) is 6.64%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that PCEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCEMX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	7.57%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	15.40%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.88%	17.80%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	17.11%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	17.82%	-0.32%

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCEMX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

PCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than FPADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments	3.77%	4.91%	1.22%	1.44%	2.52%	11.70%	1.10%	1.04%	1.84%	1.16%	1.09%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCEMX and FPADX in my portfolio?

PCEMX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCEMX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to PCEMX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEMX dropped -65.32% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 3.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.