PCEM vs. DBE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCEM (Polen Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PCEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Polen Capital, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. PCEM is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PCEM charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.

Performance

PCEM vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (PCEM) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PCEM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBE

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: 79.04%
• 6M: 69.31%
• 1Y: 81.31%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 19.05%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEM vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PCEM Polen Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	6.00%	12.55%	0.32%
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	79.04%	-2.17%	10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEM and DBE is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	-0.01

The correlation between PCEM and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCEM vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBE

DBE Risk / Return Rank: 71
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEM vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (PCEM) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCEM	DBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.09	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEM	DBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-86.69%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-32.03%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-57.30%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCEM	DBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	35.07%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	29.41%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	28.34%	—

PCEM vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEM has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCEM vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

PCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than DBE's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	2.16%	3.86%	6.32%	3.87%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	1.79%	1.67%
PCEM Polen Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	0.37%	0.40%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCEM and DBE in my portfolio?

PCEM and DBE have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCEM or DBE?

On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCEM or DBE?

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PCEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCEM or DBE?

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.37% for PCEM.

What is the main difference between PCEM and DBE?

PCEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Polen Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PCEM and 0.78% for DBE.