PCEF vs. USFR
PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PCEF is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PCEF returned 7.33%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PCEF charges 2.71%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
PCEF vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PCEF has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 7.33%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
PCEF
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
PCEF vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 4.88% | 12.59% | 16.70% | 9.39% | -18.66% | 15.38% | 4.61% | 24.08% | -8.88% | 14.48% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCEF and USFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCEF vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
PCEF
USFR
PCEF vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCEF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -48.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 13.43 | -12.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 203.42 | -201.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 787.84 | -779.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCEF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 15.11 | -13.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 9.26 | -8.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 3.07 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.60 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
PCEF vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCEF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -1.36% | -37.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -0.02% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | -0.06% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -0.18% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | -0.80% | -37.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -0.16% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 0.01% | +1.76% |
Volatility
PCEF vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that PCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCEF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 0.06% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 0.18% | +7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.61% | 0.27% | +8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 0.40% | +11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 0.81% | +12.48% |
PCEF vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCEF vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 7.73% | 7.96% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCEF and USFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCEF has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEF dropped -38.64% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 10-year performance, PCEF leads with 7.33% vs 2.47% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PCEF has performed better with a 7.33% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.
PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.
PCEF is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while USFR is Government Bonds. PCEF tracks S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCEF and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer