PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCEF vs. FCEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCEF vs. FCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FCEF's 6.40% return.


PCEF

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.15%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.42%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
7.33%

FCEF

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.10%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEF vs. FCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
4.88%12.59%16.70%9.39%-18.66%15.38%4.61%24.08%-8.88%14.48%
FCEF
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
6.40%14.39%17.51%10.27%-19.51%19.50%3.80%28.28%-9.65%15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEF and FCEF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2016

0.80

The correlation between PCEF and FCEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PCEF vs. FCEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PCEF
FCEF

Financial Services

37.2%
25.5%

Technology

22.0%
11.9%

Communication Services

7.0%
4.4%

Healthcare

6.7%
9.2%

Industrials

6.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
3.7%

Energy

4.2%
13.6%

Utilities

3.5%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.9%
3.5%

Financial Services

PCEF
37.2%
FCEF
25.5%

Technology

PCEF
22.0%
FCEF
11.9%

Communication Services

PCEF
7.0%
FCEF
4.4%

Healthcare

PCEF
6.7%
FCEF
9.2%

Industrials

PCEF
6.5%
FCEF
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PCEF
6.0%
FCEF
3.7%

Energy

PCEF
4.2%
FCEF
13.6%

Utilities

PCEF
3.5%
FCEF
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

PCEF
3.2%
FCEF
2.1%

Basic Materials

PCEF
2.8%
FCEF
2.7%

Real Estate

PCEF
0.9%
FCEF
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCEF vs. FCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEF
PCEF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FCEF
FCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEF vs. FCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCEFFCEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.30

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

10.40

-2.40

PCEF vs. FCEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FCEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEF and FCEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCEFFCEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.09

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.48

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Drawdowns

PCEF vs. FCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum FCEF drawdown of -44.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and FCEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCEFFCEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-44.81%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-7.03%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.09%

-12.39%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-25.32%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.13%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-6.28%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.55%

+0.22%

Volatility

PCEF vs. FCEF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) at 2.11%. This indicates that PCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCEFFCEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.11%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

6.18%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

7.75%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.48%

12.19%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.29%

15.42%

-2.13%

PCEF vs. FCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FCEF's 2.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCEF vs. FCEF - Dividend Comparison

PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than FCEF's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCEF
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
6.86%7.05%7.13%7.17%7.26%4.74%5.03%5.07%5.96%4.90%1.51%0.00%
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
7.73%7.96%8.79%9.86%8.93%6.67%7.54%7.12%8.21%6.96%7.72%9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCEF and FCEF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCEF has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to FCEF (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEF dropped -38.64% vs FCEF's -44.81%.

On 5-year performance, FCEF leads with 5.84% vs 4.82% for PCEF. On fees, PCEF is cheaper at 2.71% per year. On volatility, FCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCEF has performed better with a 5.84% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCEF is cheaper with a 2.71% expense ratio, compared with 2.91% for FCEF.

PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 6.86% for FCEF.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 2.91% for FCEF.

FCEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCEF and FCEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer