PCBAX vs. CAOS
PCBAX (BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both funds - PCBAX is a Macro Trading fund managed by BlackRock, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Over the past 3 years, PCBAX returned 10.05%/yr vs 4.22%/yr for CAOS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCBAX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCBAX achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.69% return.
PCBAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
CAOS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 10.12% | 6.16% | 11.77% | 3.09% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.69% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCBAX and CAOS is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCBAX vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
PCBAX
CAOS
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCBAX | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 1.18 | +1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 1.88 | +1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.24 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 2.44 | +2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 6.13 | +5.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCBAX | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.18 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.20 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBAX and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCBAX | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -3.60% | -35.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -0.76% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -3.60% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -1.19% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -0.90% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 0.30% | +0.95% |
Volatility
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.22%. This indicates that PCBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCBAX | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 0.22% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.81% | 1.02% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 1.52% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 4.26% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 4.26% | +1.88% |
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCBAX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCBAX vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
Neither PCBAX nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.67% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 2.44% | 3.08% | 9.91% | 0.80% | 1.41% | 4.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCBAX and CAOS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCBAX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to CAOS (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCBAX dropped -39.55% vs CAOS's -3.60%.
PCBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCBAX and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer