PBYI vs. GLDD
PBYI (Puma Biotechnology, Inc.) and GLDD (Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation) are both stocks. PBYI operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while GLDD operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PBYI returned -15.39%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for GLDD. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PBYI vs. GLDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBYI achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than GLDD's 29.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PBYI has underperformed GLDD with an annualized return of -15.39%, while GLDD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.
PBYI
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 31.21%
- 1Y
- 105.43%
- 3Y*
- 24.25%
- 5Y*
- -9.60%
- 10Y*
- -15.39%
GLDD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 29.57%
- 6M
- 30.27%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- 32.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
PBYI vs. GLDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBYI Puma Biotechnology, Inc. | 14.45% | 95.08% | -29.56% | 2.36% | 39.14% | -70.37% | 17.26% | -57.00% | -79.41% | 221.99% |
GLDD Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation | 29.57% | 16.21% | 47.01% | 29.08% | -62.15% | 19.36% | 16.24% | 71.15% | 22.59% | 28.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBYI and GLDD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
PBYI:
$346.26M
GLDD:
$1.15B
PBYI:
$0.48
GLDD:
$1.09
PBYI:
14.25
GLDD:
15.60
PBYI:
0.02
GLDD:
0.26
PBYI:
1.52
GLDD:
1.29
PBYI:
2.70
GLDD:
2.23
PBYI:
$227.21M
GLDD:
$888.28M
PBYI:
$169.14M
GLDD:
$203.49M
PBYI:
$46.97M
GLDD:
$125.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBYI vs. GLDD — Risk / Return Rank
PBYI
GLDD
PBYI vs. GLDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBYI | GLDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.16 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 9.69 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBYI | GLDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.07 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.19 | 0.33 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.12 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
PBYI vs. GLDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBYI drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than GLDD's maximum drawdown of -80.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBYI and GLDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBYI | GLDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -80.76% | -18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.78% | -14.74% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.59% | -39.75% | -29.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.86% | -70.30% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.76% | -70.32% | -28.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.52% | 0.00% | -97.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.42% | -32.87% | -41.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 4.79% | +6.57% |
Volatility
PBYI vs. GLDD - Volatility Comparison
Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) at 0.00%. This indicates that PBYI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBYI | GLDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 0.00% | +9.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.71% | 19.04% | +22.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.92% | 31.60% | +38.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.83% | 41.24% | +34.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.65% | 42.65% | +38.00% |
Dividends
PBYI vs. GLDD - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBYI nor GLDD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PBYI vs. GLDD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Puma Biotechnology, Inc. and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBYI vs. GLDD - Profitability Comparison
PBYI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Puma Biotechnology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.40M and revenue of 44.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.8%.
GLDD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a gross profit of 53.64M and revenue of 256.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.
PBYI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Puma Biotechnology, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.83M and revenue of 44.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.5%.
GLDD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported an operating income of 30.34M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
PBYI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Puma Biotechnology, Inc. reported a net income of -3.80M and revenue of 44.80M, resulting in a net margin of -8.5%.
GLDD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a net income of 12.63M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBYI and GLDD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBYI has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to GLDD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBYI dropped -99.40% vs GLDD's -80.76%.
PBYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBYI and GLDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer