PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBYI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBYI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBYI vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBYI
Puma Biotechnology, Inc.
7.39%95.08%-29.56%2.36%39.14%-70.37%17.26%-57.00%-79.41%221.99%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-4.63%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBYI achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PBYI has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -14.09%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.


PBYI

1D
4.24%
1M
12.11%
YTD
7.39%
6M
20.34%
1Y
115.88%
3Y*
27.40%
5Y*
-8.49%
10Y*
-14.09%

^GSPC

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-4.63%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBYI vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBYI
PBYI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PBYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBYI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PBYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBYI Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBYI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBYI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

0.90

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

1.39

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

1.40

+2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.26

6.61

+2.66

PBYI vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBYI Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBYI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBYI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.90

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.61

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

0.68

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.46

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between PBYI and ^GSPC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

PBYI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBYI drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBYI and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBYI^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-56.78%

-42.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.78%

-12.14%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.86%

-25.43%

-60.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.76%

-33.92%

-64.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.68%

-6.45%

-91.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.13%

-10.75%

-63.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.17%

2.57%

+8.60%

Volatility

PBYI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.34%. This indicates that PBYI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBYI^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

5.34%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.16%

9.54%

+43.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.70%

18.33%

+54.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.96%

16.91%

+59.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.23%

18.05%

+63.18%