PBXIX vs. HRSTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PBXIX (Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund) and HRSTX (Rational Tactical Return Fund) are both mutual funds - PBXIX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Rational Funds, while HRSTX is a Options Trading fund managed by Rational Funds. Over the past 5 years, PBXIX returned 3.59%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for HRSTX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBXIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for HRSTX.

Performance

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund (PBXIX) and Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBXIX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than HRSTX's 5.51% return.

PBXIX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 14.01%
• 3Y*: 8.67%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: —

HRSTX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 5.51%
• 1Y: 7.38%
• 3Y*: 5.20%
• 5Y*: 5.00%
• 10Y*: 5.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PBXIX Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund	9.88%	2.12%	8.23%	3.28%	-10.82%	10.23%	17.09%	1.70%
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund	5.51%	3.66%	3.23%	5.06%	5.90%	3.95%	2.65%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PBXIX and HRSTX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019	0.18

Over the past year, PBXIX and HRSTX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PBXIX vs. HRSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBXIX

PBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 52
PBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

HRSTX

HRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
HRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
HRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
HRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
HRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
HRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund (PBXIX) and Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBXIX	HRSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.55	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.10	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.51	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	2.44	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	15.35	-4.90

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the HRSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBXIX and HRSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBXIX drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, smaller than the maximum HRSTX drawdown of -69.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBXIX and HRSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBXIX	HRSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.03%	-69.69%	+45.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.16%	-3.09%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.71%	-3.09%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.57%	-3.09%	-12.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-9.10%	+8.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-31.53%	+26.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	0.49%	+0.85%

Volatility

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund (PBXIX) is 2.58%, while Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that PBXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBXIX	HRSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	3.60%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.46%	4.83%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.25%	4.88%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.66%	3.66%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.49%	7.19%	+4.30%

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBXIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HRSTX's 1.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBXIX vs. HRSTX - Dividend Comparison

PBXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than HRSTX's 8.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund	8.97%	6.72%	4.47%	5.60%	2.24%	3.75%	2.10%	3.36%	1.33%	5.55%	13.80%	4.82%
PBXIX Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund	5.34%	3.48%	2.14%	2.22%	2.25%	7.56%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBXIX and HRSTX in my portfolio?

PBXIX and HRSTX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBXIX or HRSTX?

HRSTX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to PBXIX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBXIX dropped -24.03% vs HRSTX's -69.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.