PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBW vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBW vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBW vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
3.51%53.96%-30.77%-20.03%-44.55%-29.86%204.82%62.58%-14.11%39.92%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
4.93%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBW achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PBW has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 6.57%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.


PBW

1D
4.99%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
3.51%
6M
9.88%
1Y
102.59%
3Y*
-6.15%
5Y*
-18.62%
10Y*
6.57%

XMMO

1D
4.31%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
4.93%
6M
7.61%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
18.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBW vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PBW vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBW
PBW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBW Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBW vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBWXMMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.30

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

1.86

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

2.28

+2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.87

10.83

+2.04

PBW vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBW and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBWXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.30

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.58

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.83

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.54

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between PBW and XMMO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PBW vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than XMMO's 0.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
0.86%0.79%2.84%3.68%4.21%1.71%0.44%1.45%2.04%1.28%2.68%1.53%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.71%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Drawdowns

PBW vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBW drawdown since its inception was -89.02%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBW and XMMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBWXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.02%

-55.37%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.24%

-12.81%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.98%

-27.91%

-57.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.02%

-36.74%

-52.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.91%

-4.39%

-69.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.86%

-9.52%

-53.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.70%

2.69%

+5.01%

Volatility

PBW vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a higher volatility of 12.60% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 9.07%. This indicates that PBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBWXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.60%

9.07%

+3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.89%

14.28%

+17.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.85%

21.97%

+20.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.94%

21.26%

+21.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.49%

22.11%

+16.38%