PBW vs. WNTR
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX), while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. PBW is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, PBW returned 46.40% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.48 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PBW charges 0.61%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
PBW vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBW achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.
PBW
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 46.40%
- 3Y*
- -7.64%
- 5Y*
- -15.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.58%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.14M | $32.16M | $36.05M | |
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M |
PBW vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 5.86% | 82.72% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBW and WNTR is -0.49, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBW vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
PBW
WNTR
PBW vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBW | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.71 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 6.87 | -3.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBW vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBW drawdown since its inception was -89.02%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBW and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBW | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.02% | -42.65% | -46.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.09% | -42.65% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.32% | -9.64% | -63.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.94% | -20.18% | -42.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 16.81% | -4.99% |
Volatility
PBW vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) have volatilities of 14.90% and 14.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBW | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.90% | 14.85% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.63% | 47.43% | -13.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.14% | 54.68% | -10.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.61% | 53.42% | -9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.25% | 53.42% | -14.17% |
PBW vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBW vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 1.47% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBW and WNTR have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBW has higher volatility (14.90%) compared to WNTR (14.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBW dropped -89.02% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 46.40% for PBW. On fees, PBW is cheaper at 0.61% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 46.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBW is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 1.47% for PBW.
PBW is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PBW and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBW and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer