PBTP vs. WIP
PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) and WIP (SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - PBTP tracks the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y) while WIP tracks the FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBTP returned 3.22%/yr vs -0.52%/yr for WIP. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBTP charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WIP.
Performance
PBTP vs. WIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBTP achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than WIP's 2.82% return.
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- —
WIP
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
PBTP vs. WIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 5.98% | 4.72% | 4.53% | -3.02% | 5.51% | 4.89% | 4.72% | 0.59% | 0.04% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 2.82% | 15.18% | -8.71% | 8.84% | -15.54% | -4.15% | 8.37% | 8.62% | -5.97% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBTP and WIP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.34 |
The correlation between PBTP and WIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBTP vs. WIP — Risk / Return Rank
PBTP
WIP
PBTP vs. WIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBTP | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.14 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 1.43 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.63 | 4.19 | +13.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBTP vs. WIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBTP drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum WIP drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBTP and WIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBTP | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -29.60% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.73% | -5.16% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.03% | -11.16% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.44% | -28.66% | +23.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -5.23% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -8.57% | +7.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 1.75% | -1.54% |
Volatility
PBTP vs. WIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) is 0.63%, while SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that PBTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBTP | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 2.59% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.17% | 7.07% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62% | 8.80% | -7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.85% | 11.45% | -8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.64% | 10.16% | -7.52% |
PBTP vs. WIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBTP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than WIP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBTP vs. WIP - Dividend Comparison
PBTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, which matches WIP's 5.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 5.86% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 5.87% | 5.51% | 6.06% | 6.54% | 11.15% | 4.63% | 1.59% | 2.49% | 4.05% | 1.91% | 1.27% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBTP and WIP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WIP has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to PBTP (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBTP dropped -5.44% vs WIP's -29.60%.
On 5-year performance, PBTP leads with 3.22% vs -0.52% for WIP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PBTP has performed better with a 3.22% return vs -0.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WIP.
WIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 5.86% for PBTP.
PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y), while WIP tracks FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PBTP and 0.50% for WIP.
PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBTP and WIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer