PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSMX vs. PTRQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSMX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than PTRQX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PBSMX has underperformed PTRQX with an annualized return of 2.20%, while PTRQX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.51% annualized return.


PBSMX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
2.20%

PTRQX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBSMX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
0.22%6.41%4.25%5.98%-7.06%-0.71%5.16%6.47%0.35%1.86%
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
0.43%7.81%3.06%7.80%-14.30%-1.37%8.13%10.85%-0.73%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSMX and PTRQX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.80

The correlation between PBSMX and PTRQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSMX vs. PTRQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSMX
PBSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PBSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PTRQX
PTRQX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PTRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBSMXPTRQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.75

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

5.04

+3.02

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the PTRQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSMX and PTRQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSMX drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum PTRQX drawdown of -20.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSMX and PTRQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSMXPTRQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-20.72%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.65%

-3.08%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.65%

-5.47%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.70%

-20.69%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.70%

-20.72%

+10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.59%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-3.28%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

1.07%

-0.59%

Volatility

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) is 0.67%, while PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that PBSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSMXPTRQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.82%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

3.27%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

4.21%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

6.02%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

5.26%

-2.62%

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRQX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSMX vs. PTRQX - Dividend Comparison

PBSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than PTRQX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBSMX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
3.88%3.74%3.00%2.65%2.02%1.79%2.22%2.57%2.57%2.40%2.40%2.56%
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
4.68%4.63%4.89%4.70%5.83%2.82%3.05%6.95%3.99%2.93%4.01%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBSMX and PTRQX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTRQX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to PBSMX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSMX dropped -10.70% vs PTRQX's -20.72%.

PBSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSMX and PTRQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer