PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSMX vs. FPNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSMX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than FPNIX's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PBSMX has underperformed FPNIX with an annualized return of 2.14%, while FPNIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.76% annualized return.


PBSMX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.37%
6M
0.01%
YTD
0.34%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
2.14%
ALL TIME*
4.31%

FPNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.08%
6M
-0.20%
YTD
0.02%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
2.76%
ALL TIME*
4.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBSMX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
0.34%6.41%4.25%5.98%-7.06%-0.71%5.16%6.47%0.35%1.86%
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
0.02%6.71%4.58%6.78%-3.10%0.84%2.51%3.81%2.30%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSMX and FPNIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1989

0.49

Over the past year, PBSMX and FPNIX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSMX vs. FPNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBSMX
PBSMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PBSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FPNIX
FPNIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FPNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FPNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBSMXFPNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.51

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

3.51

+3.11

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FPNIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSMX and FPNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSMX drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum FPNIX drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSMX and FPNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSMXFPNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-22.95%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.65%

-1.97%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.65%

-1.97%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.62%

-4.67%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.70%

-4.67%

-6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.30%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.86%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.85%

-0.34%

Volatility

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that PBSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSMXFPNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.48%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

1.81%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09%

2.30%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.91%

2.47%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

1.92%

+0.72%

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FPNIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSMX vs. FPNIX - Dividend Comparison

PBSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than FPNIX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
3.90%3.36%4.39%3.37%2.13%1.24%2.17%2.63%3.10%2.84%2.31%1.87%
PBSMX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
3.56%3.74%3.00%2.65%2.02%1.79%2.22%2.57%2.57%2.40%2.40%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBSMX and FPNIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBSMX has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to FPNIX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSMX dropped -10.70% vs FPNIX's -22.95%.

PBSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSMX and FPNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer