PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSMX vs. PBEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSMX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than PBEAX's 16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PBSMX has underperformed PBEAX with an annualized return of 2.20%, while PBEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.


PBSMX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
2.20%

PBEAX

1D
0.66%
1M
4.18%
YTD
16.13%
6M
15.30%
1Y
31.56%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*
14.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBSMX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
0.22%6.41%4.25%5.98%-7.06%-0.71%5.16%6.47%0.35%1.86%
PBEAX
PGIM Jennison Value Fund
16.13%16.38%27.95%14.54%-8.68%26.72%2.75%36.07%-10.53%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSMX and PBEAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1990

-0.05

The correlation between PBSMX and PBEAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSMX vs. PBEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSMX
PBSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PBSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PBEAX
PBEAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PBEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PBEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBSMXPBEAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.12

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

17.22

-9.16

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the PBEAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSMX and PBEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSMX drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum PBEAX drawdown of -58.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSMX and PBEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSMXPBEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-58.23%

+47.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.65%

-7.99%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.65%

-16.29%

+14.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.70%

-20.02%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.70%

-38.31%

+27.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

0.00%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-7.96%

+7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

1.91%

-1.43%

Volatility

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) is 0.67%, while PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that PBSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSMXPBEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

3.93%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

9.26%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

11.52%

-9.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

15.19%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

17.61%

-14.97%

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEAX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Dividend Comparison

PBSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than PBEAX's 8.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBEAX
PGIM Jennison Value Fund
8.71%10.12%14.05%7.33%8.28%6.93%4.01%16.61%10.18%6.90%4.26%8.10%
PBSMX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
3.88%3.74%3.00%2.65%2.02%1.79%2.22%2.57%2.57%2.40%2.40%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBSMX and PBEAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBEAX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to PBSMX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSMX dropped -10.70% vs PBEAX's -58.23%.

PBEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSMX and PBEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer