PBSMX vs. PBEAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PBSMX (PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) and PBEAX (PGIM Jennison Value Fund) are both mutual funds - PBSMX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by PGIM, while PBEAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PBSMX returned 2.14%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for PBEAX. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PBSMX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for PBEAX.

Performance

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSMX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than PBEAX's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PBSMX has underperformed PBEAX with an annualized return of 2.14%, while PBEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.

PBSMX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 0.01%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 1Y: 2.53%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: 2.14%
• ALL TIME*: 4.31%

PBEAX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 13.12%
• YTD: 17.57%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: 13.97%
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PBSMX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBSMX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund	0.34%	6.41%	4.25%	5.98%	-7.06%	-0.71%	5.16%	6.47%	0.35%	1.86%
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	17.57%	16.38%	27.95%	14.54%	-8.68%	26.72%	2.75%	36.07%	-10.53%	16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSMX and PBEAX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1990	-0.05

The correlation between PBSMX and PBEAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBSMX vs. PBEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBSMX

PBSMX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PBSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PBSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PBSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PBSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PBSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PBEAX

PBEAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
PBEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PBEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PBEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PBEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PBEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBSMX	PBEAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.43	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.38	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	3.57	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	14.96	-8.33

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the PBEAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSMX and PBEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSMX drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum PBEAX drawdown of -58.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSMX and PBEAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBSMX	PBEAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-58.23%	+47.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-7.99%	+6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.65%	-16.29%	+14.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.62%	-20.02%	+9.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.70%	-38.31%	+27.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.11%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-7.94%	+7.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	1.90%	-1.39%

Volatility

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) is 0.54%, while PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that PBSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBSMX	PBEAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	3.05%	-2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	9.32%	-7.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09%	11.74%	-9.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.91%	15.14%	-12.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.64%	17.50%	-14.86%

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEAX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBSMX vs. PBEAX - Dividend Comparison

PBSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than PBEAX's 8.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	8.60%	10.12%	14.05%	7.33%	8.28%	6.93%	4.01%	16.61%	10.18%	6.90%	4.26%	8.10%
PBSMX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund	3.56%	3.74%	3.00%	2.65%	2.02%	1.79%	2.22%	2.57%	2.57%	2.40%	2.40%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBSMX and PBEAX in my portfolio?

PBSMX and PBEAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBSMX or PBEAX?

PBEAX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to PBSMX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSMX dropped -10.70% vs PBEAX's -58.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.